anggap aja kalo kita yg punya dan menjalankan Multiply. trus.. kita di sue karena melanggar hukum yang emang udah ada itu. apa yg mau kita perbuat?
:)
yoi'i franz... semua kan pny opini masing2 :-) secara mp3 player/ipod juga uda menjadi wabah, itu juga sama aja uda melanggar copyright kan, kl kita denerin lagu2 copian :-D? berarti smua pabrik2 yg produce mp3 dan temen2nya juga musti di sue.. ( IMHO ) tapi pada dasarnya smua balik ke diri kita masing2, berikut further news company2 yg protesssss.....
=======================================
Well, now we know the motivation behind the elimination of downloading and the restriction on uploading. Multiply's actions, however, are like closing the barn door after the horse has long gone.
December 19, 2007 Multiply Inc. Sued by Major Label
Capitol Records, and a host of other entities owned and/or controlled by label giant EMI Music, sued the company Multiply Inc. in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. Plaintiffs allege copyright infringement arising from unauthorized use and exploitation of original sound and video recordings by encouraging and enabling users of Multiply to upload and share performances of well-known musical groups.
Capitol Records Inc.; Caroline Records Inc.; EMI Christian Music Group Inc.; Virgin Records America Inc.; Colgems EMI Music Inc.; EMI April Music Inc.; EMI Blackwood Music; EMI Full Keel Music; EMI Grove Park Music Inc.; EMI Longitude Music; EMI Robbins Catalog Inc.; EMI U Catalog Inc.; EMI Virgin Music Inc.; EMI Virgin Song Inc.; EMI Waterford Music Inc. v. Multiply Inc.; filed 12/18/2007; case CV-11357]
halah....emang aku tujuan upload music barat buat ngancurin kapitalisme musik mayor label kok...hehheheheh, aturan dari uang iklan itu Multiply memberikan kompensasi ke artis jangan ke perusahaan rekamannya...:))